I’ve recently been geeking out at io9.com. It’s a really great website, I read much more articles than on Lifehacker, which is also a very good website, don’t get me wrong, it just doesn’t have as much science fiction. (I’m comparing the two because they are the only two Gawker Media blogs I read.)
This article however is weirding me out a little bit, because really? REALLY? Who exactly wants quantity over quality? I mean, do such people actually exist? I always, always want the author to take the time and write the best book they possibly can. (Except maybe not die right after they wrote a cliffhanger, but I understand - it happens.) It’s not as if there aren’t tons and tons of books out there already, all of which one can not possibly read. And frankly, the thought that people would want more pulp to pollute the selection (just because they can’t be arsed to look around a little bit to find something among the existing good books) pisses me off. And not just because I’d be very thrilled (underestimation) if I got to read everything I wanted. I suppose the idealist in me believes that authors aren’t really under that much pressure to churn out books. At least not because of the demand.



